Spain´s labor market reform, approved by Royal Decree Law last month, is not only the most ambitious ever attempted in Spain; it is the most dramatic recorded anywhere in the OECD in the postwar period.  Is that good or bad news?  In the short term, it may be bad; in the longer term it will be good.

The labor market reform tackled all components of Spain´s dysfunctional labor market, for the first time since the Workers´ Statute was approved in 1980.

It reformed aspects of the collective bargaining system (making it easier for firms to break with sectorally-agreed wage increases and to unblock negotiations), of the training system (by making training a right for workers and mandating 20 hours of training per year), and especially of labor market contracts, the area where Spain was the greatest outlier in the OECD.  The unfair dismissal pay of 45 days per year worked was slashed to 20 in most cases, since unfair dismissal will become more difficult to prove.

The decree-law also set time limits for the legal proceedings associated with firings to avoid the drawn-out court cases that caused firms to settle for the upper limit on dismissal pay rather than pay court costs.  It created a new permanent contract for small and medium-sized firms with a one-year trial period, aimed at young people.  And it eliminated prior authorization for collective dismissals.  It also declared an intention to use temporary work agencies to support the feeble job-search efforts of the public employment service, although little detail was given and it is not certain how and when this change will be implemented.

Overall, the reform means a dramatic change in Spain´s labor markets.  According to my calculations, using the OECD´s quantitative indicator for employment-protection legislation (EPL), the rigidity of Spain´s labor markets drops by more than 25% following the reforms.  No decline of this size has been recorded anywhere in the OECD since World War II, according to my time series; and especially not in Spain.

Hence the reform is substantial, even though it still leaves Spain without the single contract that experts have called for for years and which would help the country to begin to address the duality of its labor market.

What will be the results of the reforms?  In the short term, the unfortunate reality is that they will destroy jobs.  Many firms in Spain have been waiting for a reduction in severance pay to shed unproductive workers or readjust costs, and now they will do it for a lower amount.  In essence, what the reform does in the short term is enable firms to survive the crisis, helped as well by the sharp cuts in corporate tax and the expansion of lines of credit that the government has also implemented.

In the longer term, however, the reform will stimulate job creation.  The effect may be small at first –maybe shaving half a point off the unemployment rate every year– , but this effect will be added to the impulse of economic growth once it returns next year.  Reducing joblessness to normal levels will not happen quickly, but hopefully with the reform in place, the new jobs that will be created from 2013 on will not be nearly all temporary.

It should be remembered as well that the labor market in Spain needed reform not just because it caused high unemployment or low employment, but because it had a negative effect on the overall functioning of the economy.  Productivity, for instance, is reduced by a rigid labor market.

Spain may have gotten itself “stuck” in the low-productivity, low-value-added model in large part because of its rigid labor market.  Once companies have more flexibility and workers have greater incentives to be productive and innovative, productivity should begin to grow faster.  This will mean better jobs, better incomes and a new productive model for the country in decades to come.

The labor reform will not solve all of Spain´s problems at once.  It may make things worse before they begin to get better.  But it was needed and it will make a difference.


Mirko 5 abril 2012 - 12:28

I do agree that the old regulations where bad for the companies as well as for the workers. But so far the real problem has not been addressed and that is the labor culture. The labor reform has been far too shy and lacks a strategic view with the other reforms approved so far.

1. The inflexibility / mobility: As long as living in property culture continues, mobility and flexibility will be on a weak side. And it will get even weaker as the population will realize they cannot sell their homes without losing more and more money every day. Nothing has been done to change this culture, even worse; the dysfunctional culture is feeded by more and more fiscal support.

2. The culture of inefficiency: The “precariedad” of the Jobs. There is a culture of everyone serves for every job. People get into jobs, after long selection processes to work for one or two years in a position and after that they get replaced by someone new. And this leads to another form of inefficiency even worse. People think they have to work for hours and hours, they cannot complain, because they live with the illusion they might get a fix contract. But this only leads to inefficiency, because instead of improving processes, inefficiencies are compensated with time. And even worse, as people switch to often; they do not acquire the knowledge and skills to make improvements. Was there really any need for another form of temporary labor contract, potentiating the benefit for enterprises to renew their stuff continuously?

3. And last but not least, I strongly agree with Micheal Hudson (American Professor in Missouri), companies do not contract more people because it is easier to contract, but they contract because they have more demand. And so far there has been done nothing on the demand side except weakening it. Public spending cuts and tax rises for the working class, that spend almost all their income, is just what cannot been done.

What could the government do?
1. To address the flexibility/mobility: Raise the property taxes, weakening the living in home property culture.
2. To address the culture of inefficiency: Reduce the temporary contracts, but make justified layoff even cheaper. Create a new contract form for young with a high education component, which lasts for maybe 3 years (that’s what exists in Germany).
3. Spend money in sectors that a work intensive and are strategic, and raise taxes in sectors that are not strategic to become a competitive society.

[…] i kraft sidste år. Ph.d. i økonomi og professor ved IE Business School i Madrid, Gayle Allard, skriver i et blogindlæg, at reformen øger fleksibiliteten på arbejdsmarkedet med 25 pct., og på lang […]

chicago lawyer 4 noviembre 2014 - 18:44

chicago lawyer

as a chicago lawyer I must get across my gratitude for your kind-heartedness for people that require help with this one situation. Your personal commitment to passing the solution all around has been exceptionally interesting and has usually helped wom…

Dejar un Comentario


Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle contenido relacionado con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. Aceptar